Hoffmeier Industrieanlagen
31 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Hamm 1
11.03.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Mere Work carried out. Employers with criticisms.
Hamm 2
30.09.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Hamm 3
30.09.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Hamm 4
28.02.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Satisfactory staff work. Interesting tasks. Demotivating income. Average recognition. Recommendable workplace.
Hamm 5
01.09.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Not recommendable employer.
Hamm 6
20.12.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Impeccable Leadership. Excellent activity. First class salary. Best career opportunities. Excellent employer.
Hamm 7
17.10.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Interesting tasks. Fair payments. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Hamm 8
05.09.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Hamm 9
04.01.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Interesting tasks. Excellent employer.
Hamm 10
12.07.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Beneficial career. Employers with criticisms.
Hamm 11
21.11.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Hamm 12
27.04.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Below-average salary. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Hamm 13
17.11.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Hamm 14
11.05.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Useful management. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Beneficial career. Satisfactory employment site.
Hamm 15
05.05.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Hamm 16
22.12.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Interesting tasks. Lower wage level. Beneficial career. Employers with criticisms.
Hamm 17
11.03.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Interesting tasks. High payments. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Hamm 18
05.04.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Useful management. Filling employment. Below-average salary. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Hamn 19
05.09.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Useful management. Interesting tasks. Reasonable job provider.
Germany 20
04.07.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 21
25.11.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 22
10.02.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 23
26.11.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 24
04.11.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 25
11.12.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 26
11.12.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Kambachsmühle 27
21.03.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Kambachsmühle 28
18.04.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Interesting tasks. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Recommendable workplace.
Kambachsmühle 29
21.03.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Useful management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Rüdersdorf 30
20.12.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Useful management. Filling employment. Below-average salary. Average recognition. Satisfactory employment site.
Rüdersdorf 31
18.10.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Impeccable Leadership. Interesting tasks. First class salary. Best career opportunities. Excellent employer.